By: Brian Evans

This week, a federal judge granted requests from the watchdog group Judicial Watch, who has long pointed out how Hillary Clinton’s answers were vague, dodging the questions, and seriously lacking in credibility! Now, the D.C District Court Judge Royce Lamberth agreed that he also did not find her answers satisfactory.

Fox News reported that…

A federal judge Monday granted a request from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch to have former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sit for a sworn deposition to answer questions about her use of a private email server to conduct government business.

Clinton has argued that she has already answered questions about this and should not have to do so again — the matter did not result in any charges for the then-presidential candidate in 2016 after a high-profile investigation — but D.C. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth said in his ruling that her past responses left much to be desired.

“As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business,” Lamberth said.

The judge went on to recognize that while Clinton responded to written questions in a separate case, “those responses were either incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory at best. Simply put her responses left many more questions than answers.” Lamberth said that using written questions this time “will only muddle any understanding of Secretary Clinton’s state of mind and fail to capture the full picture, thus delaying the final disposition of this case even further.”

Judge Lamberth stated…

“As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business.” He added that her “responses were either incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory at best! Simply put, her responses left many more questions than answers.”

Judge Lamberth added that this time around, he did not want written responses, but instead expects her to be deposed in person, as he said that written statements…

“will only muddle any understanding of Secretary Clinton’s state of mind and fail to capture the full picture, this delaying the final disposition of the case even further.”

Already, Judicial Watch stated that the State Department…

“failed to fully explain approximately thirty previously undisclosed Clinton emails.”

Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton wrote…